Embracing Productive Failure: Why Getting it Wrong First Might Be the Right Approach

A counterintuitive learning strategy that’s changing how we think about instruction

Here’s a wild idea: What if we told learners to dive into complex problems before we taught them how to solve them? What if we let them struggle, make mistakes, and yes—even fail—before stepping in with our carefully crafted lessons?

If that sounds backwards to you, you’re not alone. But according to researcher Manu Kapur, this approach might be exactly what our learners need.

What Is Productive Failure?

Productive Failure is Kapur’s research-backed learning design that flips traditional instruction on its head. Instead of the classic “teach first, practice second” model, learners tackle challenging problems without prior instruction. They explore, struggle, and typically don’t arrive at the correct solution.

But here’s the kicker—that initial “failure” isn’t actually failure at all. It’s preparation.

When learners eventually receive proper instruction after their struggle session, something magical happens. They understand the concepts more deeply, remember them longer, and can transfer their knowledge to new situations better than students who learned through traditional methods.

How Does It Actually Work?

Think of it like trying to assemble IKEA furniture without the manual first. (We’ve all been there, right?) You fumble around, try different approaches, and probably get frustrated. But when you finally crack open those instructions, suddenly everything clicks. You understand why certain pieces go together because you’ve already explored what doesn’t work.

Kapur’s research shows this process creates something called “knowledge differentiation.” Learners develop a richer understanding of the problem space. They’ve explored dead ends, discovered patterns, and built mental models—even if those models are initially incorrect.

When the instructor finally steps in with the “right” way, learners can:

  • Compare their approaches with the expert solution
  • Understand why certain methods work better
  • See the underlying principles more clearly
  • Remember the lesson more vividly

What This Means for L&D

As learning professionals, we’re often terrified of letting people struggle. We want to prevent frustration and guide learners efficiently toward the right answer. But Productive Failure suggests we might be doing them a disservice.

Consider these applications:

Case Study Training: Instead of presenting the perfect decision-making framework first, give learners a messy, real-world case. Let them wrestle with it. Then introduce your framework and show how it would have helped.

Software Training: Before walking through the “correct” workflow, let users explore the interface. They’ll discover pain points and develop questions that make your subsequent training more meaningful.

Leadership Development: Present managers with a challenging personnel situation before teaching conflict resolution skills. Their initial attempts will highlight exactly why those skills matter.

The Sweet Spot of Struggle

Now, before you throw your learners into the deep end completely, remember that Kapur emphasizes productive failure. The problems need to be:

  • Challenging but not impossible: Learners should be able to make some progress
  • Connected to prior knowledge: They need enough background to engage meaningfully
  • Followed by quality instruction: The struggle is only productive if good teaching follows

If learners are completely lost or the follow-up instruction is poor, you’ll just have regular failure—and nobody learns from that.

Making It Work in Practice

Here are some practical tips for implementing Productive Failure in your programs:

Start small: Try it with one module or concept first. See how your learners respond.

Set expectations: Let learners know this approach is intentional. Explain that struggling is part of the process, not a sign they’re doing something wrong.

Debrief thoroughly: The magic happens when you connect their struggle to the subsequent instruction. Make those connections explicit.

Collect feedback: Pay attention to learner reactions and adjust your approach based on what you discover.

The Bottom Line

Productive Failure isn’t about being mean to learners or making training unnecessarily difficult. It’s about recognizing that the human brain learns through contrast and comparison. When we’ve wrestled with a problem, we’re primed to appreciate and understand the solution.

So maybe it’s time to get comfortable with learner discomfort. Maybe we need to resist our instinct to smooth out every bump in the learning journey. Sometimes, the best thing we can do for our learners is let them get it wrong first.

After all, if failure is productive, what does that make our perfectly polished, frustration-free training programs?

Further Reading & Resources

Want to dive deeper into Productive Failure? Here are the essential resources for L&D practitioners:

Academic Research (For the Evidence-Based Approach)

If you need to build a business case or understand the science behind why this works:

  • Kapur, M. (2014). Productive failure in learning math. Cognitive Science, 38(5), 1008-1022.
  • Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26(3), 379-424.
  • Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2012). Designing for productive failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), 45-83.
  • Sinha, T., & Kapur, M. (2019). When Productive Failure Fails. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.

Practitioner Resources (For Real-World Application)

Harvard Business Review: “To Help Your Team Learn, Set Them Up for Productive Failure”
The must-read piece for managers and L&D leaders. Published November 2024, this article translates research into actionable workplace strategies.

Manu Kapur’s Official Research Hub
The authoritative source for all things Productive Failure. Includes Kapur’s complete publication list, speaking engagements, and latest research updates.

“Triple Your Learning” Podcast Interview
Recent interview (November 2024) where Kapur discusses the “3X learning effect” and shares practical examples. Perfect for understanding the real-world impact.

Book Resource Site
Companion site to Kapur’s book “Productive Failure: Unlocking Deeper Learning Through the Science of Failing.” Great for case studies and implementation ideas.

Times Higher Education Implementation Guide
Practical guide showing how to use Productive Failure in educational and training contexts. Published October 2024.

Why These Resources Matter

These aren’t just academic papers collecting dust. The recent Harvard Business Review piece and podcast interviews show that Productive Failure is actively being implemented in workplaces right now. The academic sources give you the research foundation to justify budget and time investments, while the practitioner resources help you actually design and implement programs that work.

Start with the HBR article for a quick overview, then dive into Kapur’s website for deeper implementation strategies. The academic papers are your secret weapon when stakeholders ask for proof that this isn’t just another training fad.


Ready to experiment with Productive Failure in your own programs? Start with one low-stakes module and see what happens. Your learners might surprise you—and themselves—with what they can figure out when you give them the chance to struggle first.

Published by Mike Taylor

Born with a life-long passion for learning, I have the great fortune to work at the intersection of learning, design, technology & collaboration.

4 thoughts on “Embracing Productive Failure: Why Getting it Wrong First Might Be the Right Approach

  1. This is a strategy that plays to our common sense, or at least our common experience. Thinking back to our own learning, whether in school or the workplace, we tend to recall most vividly the mistakes that we made rather than the things that we got correct. Partly this relates to the emotional component that makes the mistakes so memorable, but it only emphasizes the point of the article. We learn more from our mistakes than we do from getting it right (especially if getting it right comes easy). Excellent article.

    Like

  2. This is a fantastic breakdown of Productive Failure—and it connects beautifully with both the Learning in the Flow of Work and Five Moments of Need frameworks.

    In terms of Learning in the Flow of Work, Productive Failure can become the work. When we design real-world challenges or embed decision-making tasks into platforms employees already use (like MS Teams or Salesforce), the “struggle” becomes part of their everyday workflow. The immediate relevance increases engagement, and the follow-up instruction can be timed to when the learner is most receptive—right after they’ve hit a wall.

    From a Five Moments of Need perspective, Productive Failure shines during:

    • New learning (Moment 1): learners encounter a novel challenge first.
    • Apply (Moment 2): they try to solve it without help—right in the workflow.
    • Solve (Moment 4): once they get stuck, targeted instruction helps them understand why their approach didn’t work and how to fix it.

    I especially love the idea of repositioning struggle not as a sign of failure, but as an intentional design choice to deepen learning. Thanks for bringing this conversation to the forefront!

    Like

Leave a reply to Cimberli Kearns Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.